Cathy Horyn
has been writing for the Fashion and Style section of The New York Times since
1999. She started her career in fashion journalist in Detroit and soon she was
writing for The Washington Post. Also, she has contributed with her articles to
Vanity Fair, Vogue and Harper’s Bazaar.
The review
published on Monday, February 11, 2013 is entitled Wang’s Going-Away Present and covers the third day of the New York
Fashion Week Fall 2013. In the review, she analysis the collections of
Alexander Wang, Joseph Altuzarra, Prabal Gurung, Rag & Bone, Band of
Outsiders, Victoria Beckham, Louise Golding and Yuming Weng.
Horyn
centers her attention in Alexander Wang’s collection and slightly analysis the
other designers according to their relevance. She puts several “buts” all along
the review, as she analysis different collections. However, the strongest “but”
is on the review of Wang.
It’s not
surprising Horyn’s rowdy reputation in fashion’s world, taking into account her
judgemental writing style. In this review, it is distinctive the ironic tone
with hints of provocation. Also, the
strength of her voice is remarkable all along the review, especially when she
uses the first person or certain words such as, “this collection was more
merchandised than designed”.
Josh Haner/The New York Times
Hi Ana,
ResponderEliminarHoryn has a knack for keeping things real and I appreciate that. In the world of fashion there is so much impracticality, particularly with women's' wear. I love that she asks the question, Why complicate things? And goes on to point out that doubling up jackets is silly and uncomfortable. I think she also does a nice job of pointing out Wang's fabric flops and the image of him flying down the runway is hilarious and humbling.
I'm curious to hear more about your reactions to the piece tonight in class.
Alaina